Concentrating on the former likely makes the most sense for any organization. There are players for whom it doesn’t matter. There are players who might benefit from learning to bunt well. Speed leading to infield hits were a bit reason for his. Learning to drag a bunt for a hit might take more skill, but I remember a piece ESPN did on Brett Butler in the 1990s where he said he could teach anyone to bunt like he did. This is something that should be learned at a young age, then a few bunts in batting practice to keep the skill honed. In high run eras like today, the sacrifice is a late inning strategy for close games, where one run might mean a win.įinally, why do MLB organizations need to teach bunting? It’s catching the ball with the bat. In low scoring eras, getting that first run on the board was important, so having a number two hitter who bunted well worked. Most people think of bunting in the first sense, however, advancing runners. Of course, the previous decade showed that most players and organizations didn’t think bunting against the shift was a better strategy than going for the home run. His occasional bunts kept the defense honest they couldn’t play farther back to take away hits. Mickey Mantle would bunt for the latter reason. Bunting has two uses advancing runners to increase the chance of scoring a run, or taking advantage of the defense to reach base. It’s also not clear what bunting means in this scenario. The Yankees finished fifth, four game under. He did such a good job of emphasizing that, he gave credence to the contention that the Yankees lack the power they will need to fight off such challengers as Milwaukee, Baltimore and Detroit. ![]() In planning this year’s strategy, Steinbrenner emphasized that the Yankees would become a team of speed. ![]() I can’t help but remember the signing of Dave Collins before the 1982 season as George Steinbrenner decided the Yankees needed to be a speed team: Teaching bunting is also very different from using bunting. So we’re gonna start right up again at the player development level, with everything we were doing a few years ago.” īrian Cashman walked back those comments a bit. ![]() “But Aaron Boone feels it’s becoming a bigger part of the game again,” Steinbrenner said. Steinbrenner went on to say that, yes, in line with where the game was heading a few years ago, the Yankees “cut back on the bunting skills” in the minor leagues. “So one thing that was discussed in August is bunting - I think Aaron Boone thinks that we’re not teaching the young players to bunt enough,” Steinbrenner said. In a bizarre moment during his Zoom press conference with reporters on Tuesday, while he was being pressed for specifics on substantial changes the Yankees might make, Hal Steinbrenner finally offered an example. Hal Steinbrenner brings up bunting as an example of how the Yankees will change their minor league development:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |